Wind blade finishing can account for nearly half of the total production time but advances in automation are helping speed up the process.

By Mary Lou Jay

Structural engineers and process managers tend to focus on materials, infusion, bonding and assembly when they discuss the manufacture of giant wind turbine blades. “But the reality is that only represents about 55% to 60% of the total manpower hours that go into the blade,” says Steve Nolet, senior director of technology and innovation at TPI Composites Inc. “There are a tremendous number of operations that have to occur downstream of that infusion and assembly stream.”

TPI produces wind blades for numerous wind turbine manufacturers, and the processes vary slightly by blade design and customer preference. But manufacturing typically begins with lay-up and infusion of both the pressure side and the suction side of the mold halves. After that process is complete, the blade sections remain in the molds for assembly.

The next step is to bond shear webs onto a blade section, usually the pressure side. Epoxy bond paste is dispensed onto the surface of the spar cap in the mold, prior to the final location and placement of the shear web. The placement process is machine-assisted; bridge cranes equipped with large gantries pick up the shear webs, and the operator moves them into the general position along the blade. Using registration points to determine the exact location, the gantry places each web and holds it in place until the epoxy bond cures.

“The placement of the shear web is very accurate; we have about a 5-millimeter tolerance allowed on an 80-meter-long layout,” Nolet explains.

Composite technicians then apply epoxy bond paste to all the blade and shear web surfaces to be bonded and close the mold to join the pressure and suction sides of the turbine blade together.

Automating Finishing Processes

Manufacturers of aerospace and automotive composite components have automated many of their lay-up and assembly processes.

“Aerospace assembly is a combination of manual/hand and automation,” says Rich Schultz, aerospace program manager at FANUC, an automation solutions provider. “The aerospace primes are constantly evaluating ways to improve automation. The main benefits of increasing automation are higher levels of accuracy and less need for rework. With the size and cost of most aerospace composite parts, the improved consistency of application that automation enables helps minimize the costly rework and scrapped parts.”